Lichfield District…a deluge of houses on the way?
The District of Lichfield is heading for a massive catastrophe with a possible 21,000 more houses being forced upon us!
Now listen carefully. This is a long post by me but it is about a subject which will affect everyone who lives in Lichfield District, which includes much of the rural areas close to Tamworth. This isn’t one of those things you can say ‘it will never happen’. Six month ago I would have said that but things are heading in the wrong direction.
Six months ago when John Prescott decided to use his scatter gun or one size fits all approach to more housing, few people really believed his position of wanting a further monumental increase in house building across most of the country would be taken seriously. Think on; it has been!
Now, the whole business of strategic housing for the country and therefore Staffordshire over the next fifteen years or so is very high level and complicated. So much so that it bypasses almost all the population! As of today a report is going to the Cabinet of Labour controlled Staffordshire County Council containing recommendations which are crucial and appalling for Lichfield District!
So how does it all work? Central Government (was Mr Prescott but he got the push and it’s now Ruth Kelly) are responsible for deciding how many new houses our country needs going forwards. They look at population movement, immigration, economic regeneration and many other issues. They then propose (this government’s propositions tend to end up as ‘you will do this’) to the West Midlands Regional Assembly (that’s the unelected extra tier of regional government that was slipped in under the radar without any consultation by John Prescott a few years ago) the number of houses they want to see built in the West Midlands region.
Next in line are the region’s County Councils, Birmingham City and Stoke City as strategic planning authorities. In Staffordshire, the County Council consults with all the local councils like Lichfield, Tamworth, Cannock and others (8 in all) before making a recommendation to the West Midlands Regional Assembly on how the number of houses should be distributed throughout the local council areas. The WMRA look at all the submissions from the strategic authorities and then make a decision (despite being an unelected body) on what recommendation will go forward to Central Government on behalf of the whole region. So that is the process. One last thing on this bit. Because it is Staffordshire County Council who are providing almost all the officials to compile the WMRA submission to Central Government, I believe that our strategic authority (Staffordshire CC) will have very very significant influence on what goes forwards to Central Government.
Now to the numbers. As it stands, there are three ‘options’ for the West Midlands region. The first is 381,000 new houses, the second is 491,200 and the third (the extra one which has been added) is 575,000.
Remember, the Government’s been found out on the way its consultations are carried out this week. After challenge in the High Court, the Government were told by the judge that their consultation on another national issue was totally inadequate. The response by Government…..’despite that, our policy remains unchanged’. So that sets the scene.
Everyone in the know says that the first option (381k) is simply a token entry. Most thought that option two (491k) was favourite; now, however, the unofficial noises coming from Central Government sources are that the 575,000 is what is needed and that will be their position.
I think we need to ignore option one because, quite frankly, it’s not going to be acceptable to Central Government. Option two is still possible but, as I say, the smart money has moved firmly to option three….the big one meaning 575k. Back to who does what. Based on that option Staffordshire County would be asked to accommodate 77,900 extra houses. You can find the detailed report here.
The County Council have decided that Lichfield District can cope with 16,000 new houses. A far greater increase in numbers than any other local council in Staffordshire under what is the likely total number for the region. But wait, it gets worse. The County also propose that Tamworth Borough can accomodate 5,000 extra houses despite the fact that Tamworth BC has pretty well run out of land. And the County know that!
So where will those 5000 extra houses that Tamworth BC cannot possibly find room for go? Under the planning rules almost all of them will be required by law to come to Lichfield District. Where will they go in Lichfield District? Well there isn’t anything like enough development land so next stop is building thousands of new houses on land which is currently Green Belt.
The 16,000 houses option would be horrendous, but in reality, 21,000 new houses in Lichfield District would be staggering. Currently there are around 32,000 houses in the entire District. I trust you will also be concerned if you live in Lichfield District or simply don’t want the country’s Green Belt to be destroyed by development. Where we live may be changed beyond recognition with a possible 70% increase to the number of houses!
What do you think?
Click here to comment on this post



7 comments
I feel that Lichfield is slowly being wrecked and that the visitors who come to see this perfect little Georgian town will no longer be able to find it and no longer come. Also living in a village Stonnall] I feel it is only a matter of time before greedy developers backed by the government will be casting envious eyes on our greenbelt which our village works so hsrd to protect. We have just come second in the ‘best community village’ and it would be a catastrophe to have it ruined and swallowed up by housing. Liz DeCalmer
I completely agree the situation is very worrying. I have emailed wmrc to express my personal opposition and Wigginton and Hopwas Parish Council, while still considering their position, are likely to reluctantly accept the lowest option. We are particularly concerned about the position in Tamworth where there is a continual threat of massive development in our area. I regard this as a particular problem because of the poor record of past Tamworth developments with their ugly, skyline destroying, tower blocks and the future slum of the Glascote/Amington development. The “development” of the town centre is also rather dubious.
So much about the Government’s house building policy does not seem to make sense - either nationally or locally.
The government has recognised that environmental concerns are now vital - so should we be destroying yet more highly productive Midlands farmland when it could be producing low-mileage foodstuffs, biofuels and employment for rural communities?
Furthermore, according to the “Spatial Options - Summary Leaflet” published by the WRMA “the Government believes that by substantially increasing the level of house building, general affordability will improve”. This is a very odd justification for excessive house building, and in a market full of property investors always able to pay top-dollar, would seem to be highly unrealistic. Even if it worked by over-saturating the market, it could devalue all existing properties, destabilise the housing market and remove the equity on which most UK consumer credit is underpinned, causing major economic problems.
Like most people affected by this decision, I don’t have the day-to-day exposure to the complex planning process (and all its jargon) that is required to fully understand the situation at either the macro or micro scale. Given that these “proposals” seem to be a national edict backed by the unaccountable WMRA, I get the feeling that it is largely unstoppable. Is this really the case?
I’ve signed your online petition, but what else can we do?
I tried to regsiter a comment on the website/petition that I did not agree with it. No option given for that. Why?
Your stance is Nimbyism only and although I wil continue to support the Conservatives in a general election I find myself now unable to do so locally.
New houses are needed. You seem to have no thought for thosse unable to get on the housing ladder.
Regarding Rod Bull’s comments, I don’t believe it to be nimbyism but pragmatism.
I entirely agree with you that there need to be more affordable houses. Many next generations in the numerous villages I represent are unable to stay in the same place as their parents or families because the cost of housing is prohibitive.
The problem is not so much the overall number of houses being proposed for Staffordshire but the fact that with around 30,000 dwellings currently in Lichfield District, another 20,000 plus on top of that would change the entire nature of the district beyond recognition.
We are certainly not saying no houses, we do need more affordable homes for people starting out. What we are saying is that 21,000 is too many when other areas within Staffordshire want more but are not being allocated them. It is a balance; more of the correct type of housing in the right place, but not so many that it changes what Lichfield is.
To build more homes in an area whose infrastructure is bursting at the seams is maddness and dictitorial.
More homes mean more roads/pavements hence drains straight into the rivers hence more flooding.
Inovative new towns need building from scratch ( possibly using the acres of MOD land)easy options are destroying both quality of life and our beloved plannet. Enough is enough!!
Glad to see someone is staying on top of things.
Leave a Comment